Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFAX vs NPFFX
MGFAX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MGFAX vs NPFFX
MGFAX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFAX vs. NPFFX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFAX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFAX (132M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MGFAX: NPFFX (0.92) vs MGFAX (0.00). MGFAX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MGFAX (22 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). MGFAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). MGFAX (24.00) and NPFFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGFAX: NPFFX (250) vs MGFAX (1000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.25 vs. MGFAX (-25.71). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. MGFAX (-61.29).
| MGFAX | NPFFX | MGFAX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.77 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.77 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.102 | 3.058 | 36% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.71 | 3.25 | -790% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.16 | 31.46 | -112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -61.29 | 9.71 | -631% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.73 | 102.42 | -41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers