Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFAX vs RNPFX
MGFAX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts MGFAX vs RNPFX
MGFAX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFAX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFAX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. MGFAX (137M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than MGFAX: RNPFX (1.18) vs MGFAX (0.00). MGFAX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: MGFAX (22 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). MGFAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). MGFAX (24.00) and RNPFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGFAX: RNPFX (250) vs MGFAX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. MGFAX (-23.61). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.82 vs. MGFAX (-61.07).
| MGFAX | RNPFX | MGFAX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.45 | 318% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.45 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.647 | 7.428 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.61 | 6.08 | -388% |
| Returns for 3 years | -30.84 | 42.55 | -72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -61.07 | 12.82 | -476% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.69 | 113.76 | -36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers