Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFRX vs NPFCX
MGFRX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts MGFRX vs NPFCX
MGFRX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFRX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFRX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFRX (141M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than MGFRX: NPFCX (0.33) vs MGFRX (0.00). MGFRX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: MGFRX (12 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than MGFRX (1.38). MGFRX (24.00) and NPFCX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: MGFRX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. MGFRX (-20.49). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.52 vs. MGFRX (-59.19).
| MGFRX | NPFCX | MGFRX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.47 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.47 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.034 | 4.931 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.49 | 6.26 | -327% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.13 | 30.32 | -109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -59.19 | 8.52 | -695% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.83 | 96.35 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers