Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFRX vs NPFCX
MGFRX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts MGFRX vs NPFCX
MGFRX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFRX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFRX is a Buy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. MGFRX (134M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than MGFRX: NPFCX (0.33) vs MGFRX (0.00). MGFRX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: MGFRX (12 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than MGFRX (1.38). MGFRX (24.00) and NPFCX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: MGFRX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.83 vs. MGFRX (-26.15). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.04 vs. MGFRX (-62.73).
| MGFRX | NPFCX | MGFRX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.47 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.47 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.730 | 6.030 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.15 | 2.83 | -925% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.06 | 35.62 | -93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -62.73 | 6.04 | -1,039% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.86 | 98.13 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement