Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFSX vs NPFCX
MGFSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts MGFSX vs NPFCX
MGFSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFSX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. MGFSX (133M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: NPFCX (0.33) vs MGFSX (0.00). MGFSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: MGFSX (22 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than MGFSX (1.03). MGFSX (24.00) and NPFCX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: MGFSX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.59 vs. MGFSX (-22.67). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.34 vs. MGFSX (-57.44).
| MGFSX | NPFCX | MGFSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.47 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.47 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.486 | 5.633 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.67 | 1.59 | -1,427% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.66 | 36.28 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.44 | 6.34 | -906% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.27 | 95.50 | -36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers