Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFSX vs NPFCX
MGFSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts MGFSX vs NPFCX
MGFSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFSX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFSX (135M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: NPFCX (0.33) vs MGFSX (0.00). MGFSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: MGFSX (22 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than MGFSX (1.03). MGFSX (24.00) and NPFCX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: MGFSX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. MGFSX (-20.95). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.49 vs. MGFSX (-56.38).
| MGFSX | NPFCX | MGFSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.47 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.47 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.491 | 3.465 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.95 | 4.18 | -501% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.54 | 29.04 | -102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -56.38 | 7.49 | -753% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.62 | 92.95 | -36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement