Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFSX vs NPFFX
MGFSX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MGFSX vs NPFFX
MGFSX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFSX vs. NPFFX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFSX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFSX (140M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: NPFFX (0.94) vs MGFSX (0.00). MGFSX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MGFSX (22 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). MGFSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). MGFSX (24.00) and NPFFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFFX: MGFSX (0) vs NPFFX (250). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. MGFSX (-17.64). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.09 vs. MGFSX (-55.69).
| MGFSX | NPFFX | MGFSX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.77 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.77 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.731 | 8.087 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.94 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.64 | 9.02 | -196% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.03 | 39.72 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -55.69 | 14.09 | -395% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.92 | 109.89 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers