Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFSX vs RNPFX
MGFSX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts MGFSX vs RNPFX
MGFSX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFSX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFSX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFSX (135M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: RNPFX (1.19) vs MGFSX (0.00). MGFSX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: MGFSX (22 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). MGFSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). MGFSX (24.00) and RNPFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: MGFSX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. MGFSX (-20.95). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.68 vs. MGFSX (-56.38).
| MGFSX | RNPFX | MGFSX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.45 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.45 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.491 | 4.040 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.95 | 5.69 | -368% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.54 | 34.39 | -86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -56.38 | 13.68 | -412% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.62 | 107.81 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement