Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFZX vs RNPEX
MGFZX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts MGFZX vs RNPEX
MGFZX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFZX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFZX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFZX (132M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than MGFZX: RNPEX (0.94) vs MGFZX (0.00). MGFZX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: MGFZX (12 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). MGFZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). MGFZX (24.00) and RNPEX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: MGFZX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. MGFZX (-23.00). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 9.51 vs. MGFZX (-57.60).
| MGFZX | RNPEX | MGFZX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.360 | 3.065 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.94 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.00 | 3.21 | -718% |
| Returns for 3 years | -30.51 | 31.33 | -97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -57.60 | 9.51 | -606% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.14 | 101.60 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers