Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGKAX vs NPFCX
MGKAX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts MGKAX vs NPFCX
MGKAX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGKAX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGKAX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGKAX (45.8M). MGKAX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: MGKAX (0.91) vs NPFCX (0.33). MGKAX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: MGKAX (7 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). MGKAX (8.98) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). MGKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGKAX: NPFCX (250) vs MGKAX (1000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. MGKAX (-13.92). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.52 vs. MGKAX (-18.42).
| MGKAX | NPFCX | MGKAX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.47 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 8.98 | 1.47 | 611% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.528 | 4.931 | 31% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.33 | 277% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.92 | 6.26 | -222% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.11 | 30.32 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.42 | 8.52 | -216% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers