Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGKIX vs NPFCX
MGKIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts MGKIX vs NPFCX
MGKIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGKIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGKIX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGKIX (45.8M). MGKIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: MGKIX (1.11) vs NPFCX (0.33). MGKIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: MGKIX (7 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). MGKIX (8.16) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). MGKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGKIX: NPFCX (250) vs MGKIX (1000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. MGKIX (-13.41). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.52 vs. MGKIX (-16.40).
| MGKIX | NPFCX | MGKIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.47 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 8.16 | 1.47 | 555% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.664 | 4.931 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.33 | 339% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.41 | 6.26 | -214% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.51 | 30.32 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.40 | 8.52 | -193% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers