Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGLCX vs NRCFX
MGLCX vs NRCFX Comparison
Open Charts MGLCX vs NRCFX
MGLCX vs NRCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGLCX vs. NRCFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGLCX is a Hold and NRCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.17B vs. NRCFX (35.9M). NRCFX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: NRCFX (2.11) vs MGLCX (1.83). MGLCX was incepted earlier than NRCFX: MGLCX (12 years) vs NRCFX (26 years). NRCFX (2.81) is less costly to investors than MGLCX (1.94). NRCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). MGLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRCFX: MGLCX (1000) vs NRCFX (2500). NRCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. MGLCX (10.96). NRCFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.24 vs. MGLCX (-12.35).
| MGLCX | NRCFX | MGLCX / NRCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.90 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.81 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.321 | 12.221 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 35.9M | 6,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 2.11 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.96 | 13.85 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 38.47 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.35 | 3.24 | -381% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.62 | -6.59 | -237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement