Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGLCX vs NRFAX
MGLCX vs NRFAX Comparison
Open Charts MGLCX vs NRFAX
MGLCX vs NRFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGLCX vs. NRFAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGLCX is a Buy and NRFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. NRFAX (34.5M). NRFAX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: NRFAX (3.00) vs MGLCX (1.90). MGLCX was incepted earlier than NRFAX: MGLCX (12 years) vs NRFAX (26 years). NRFAX (2.06) is less costly to investors than MGLCX (1.94). NRFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). MGLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRFAX: MGLCX (1000) vs NRFAX (2500). NRFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. MGLCX (3.22). NRFAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.78 vs. MGLCX (-16.30).
| MGLCX | NRFAX | MGLCX / NRFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.15 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.06 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.686 | 8.508 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 34.5M | 5,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 3.00 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.22 | 7.20 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.08 | 33.06 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.30 | 2.78 | -587% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.25 | 0.65 | 2,183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement