Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGLCX vs NRFAX
MGLCX vs NRFAX Comparison
Open Charts MGLCX vs NRFAX
MGLCX vs NRFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGLCX vs. NRFAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGLCX is a Hold and NRFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.17B vs. NRFAX (35.9M). NRFAX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: NRFAX (2.90) vs MGLCX (1.83). MGLCX was incepted earlier than NRFAX: MGLCX (12 years) vs NRFAX (26 years). NRFAX (2.06) is less costly to investors than MGLCX (1.94). NRFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). MGLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRFAX: MGLCX (1000) vs NRFAX (2500). NRFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.77 vs. MGLCX (10.96). NRFAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.85 vs. MGLCX (-12.35).
| MGLCX | NRFAX | MGLCX / NRFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.15 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.06 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.321 | 12.810 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 35.9M | 6,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 2.90 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.96 | 14.77 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 41.63 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.35 | 6.85 | -180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.62 | -0.09 | -17,549% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement