Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGLCX vs NRFNX
MGLCX vs NRFNX Comparison
Open Charts MGLCX vs NRFNX
MGLCX vs NRFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGLCX vs. NRFNX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGLCX is a Hold and NRFNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.21B vs. NRFNX (36.2M). NRFNX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: NRFNX (3.59) vs MGLCX (1.83). MGLCX was incepted earlier than NRFNX: MGLCX (12 years) vs NRFNX (13 years). MGLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than NRFNX (1.67). NRFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). MGLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRFNX: MGLCX (1000) vs NRFNX (1000000). NRFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.78 vs. MGLCX (15.20). NRFNX return over 5 years is better than : 8.48 vs. MGLCX (-10.69).
| MGLCX | NRFNX | MGLCX / NRFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.85 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.67 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.299 | 14.072 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 36.2M | 6,116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 3.59 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.20 | 19.78 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.13 | 35.78 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.69 | 8.48 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.32 | -1.79 | -909% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers