Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGLCX vs NRFNX
MGLCX vs NRFNX Comparison
Open Charts MGLCX vs NRFNX
MGLCX vs NRFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGLCX vs. NRFNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGLCX is a Hold and NRFNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. NRFNX (34.7M). NRFNX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: NRFNX (3.55) vs MGLCX (1.93). MGLCX was incepted earlier than NRFNX: MGLCX (11 years) vs NRFNX (13 years). MGLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than NRFNX (1.61). NRFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). MGLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRFNX: MGLCX (1000) vs NRFNX (1000000). NRFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.43 vs. MGLCX (5.18). NRFNX return over 5 years is better than : 4.78 vs. MGLCX (-12.67).
| MGLCX | NRFNX | MGLCX / NRFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.85 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.61 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.821 | 7.321 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 34.7M | 6,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 3.55 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.18 | 10.43 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.68 | 32.01 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.67 | 4.78 | -265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.48 | -0.43 | -3,359% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement