Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGLCX vs SREAX
MGLCX vs SREAX Comparison
Open Charts MGLCX vs SREAX
MGLCX vs SREAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGLCX vs. SREAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGLCX is a Hold and SREAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.17B vs. SREAX (263M). SREAX (1.88) and MGLCX (1.83) have matching dividends . MGLCX was incepted earlier than SREAX: MGLCX (12 years) vs SREAX (12 years). MGLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SREAX (1.64). SREAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). MGLCX (1000) and SREAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SREAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. MGLCX (10.96). SREAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.05 vs. MGLCX (-12.35).
| MGLCX | SREAX | MGLCX / SREAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.30 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.64 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.321 | 13.841 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 263M | 826% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.88 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.96 | 15.20 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 45.01 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.35 | 13.05 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.62 | 77.34 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement