Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGNDX vs RGEBX
MGNDX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MGNDX vs RGEBX
MGNDX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGNDX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGNDX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MGNDX (827M). MGNDX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MGNDX (0.05) vs RGEBX (0.00). MGNDX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MGNDX (19 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than MGNDX (0.62). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MGNDX (17.99). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGNDX: RGEBX (250) vs MGNDX (2500). MGNDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). MGNDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.05 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| MGNDX | RGEBX | MGNDX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.586 | 8.727 | 98% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 827M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | -0.77 | -1,073% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.91 | 39.77 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.05 | 9.71 | 464% |
| Returns for 10 years | 234.68 | 97.58 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement