MGNR
Price
$54.27
Change
-$0.12 (-0.22%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$113.63
Change
-$1.14 (-0.99%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
4.7B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGNR vs XME

MGNR vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) vs. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is an actively managed thematic fund targeting global natural resources companies, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is a passive, equal-weighted ETF focused on U.S. metals and mining firms.
  • MGNR maintains a concentrated portfolio of 30 to 60 holdings with an expense ratio of 0.75%, whereas XME holds approximately 39 securities and charges a lower expense ratio of 0.35%.
  • Both ETFs provide exposure to metals, mining, and resource-related equities, yet MGNR offers broader global diversification across energy, agriculture, and chemicals, while XME emphasizes U.S.-listed metals and mining sub-industries.
  • Structural differences include MGNR’s active stock selection by sub-advisor GLG versus XME’s rules-based, modified equal-weighted index methodology with quarterly rebalancing.
  • Investors seeking lower costs and U.S. market-cap breadth may favor XME, while those preferring active management and wider thematic coverage across natural resources may consider MGNR.
  • Liquidity profiles differ, with XME generally exhibiting higher average daily trading volume as a long-established fund compared to the newer MGNR.

Introduction

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) both target equities tied to natural resources and mining activities. They do not compete directly as identical products but instead offer alternative exposure within the broader resources sector. MGNR employs active management for global natural resources opportunities, while XME delivers passive, equal-weighted access to U.S. metals and mining companies. Investors evaluating sector exposure, cost efficiency, and thematic positioning in the current environment may compare these two ETFs to determine which aligns better with portfolio objectives.

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) Overview

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in February 2024. The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of companies primarily engaged in natural resources and related businesses. These include metals, agricultural products, timber, water, energy from fossil and renewable sources, and chemicals. The portfolio typically contains 30 to 60 global large- and mid-cap holdings. Top positions have included companies such as Hudbay Minerals Inc., Equinox Gold Corp., and Teck Resources Ltd. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. Sub-advisor GLG applies fundamental top-down and bottom-up research without tracking a specific index. The fund distributes dividends quarterly.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund launched in June 2006. It seeks to track the total return performance of the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index before fees and expenses. The index represents the metals and mining segment of the S&P Total Market Index and includes sub-industries such as aluminum, copper, diversified metals and mining, gold, silver, steel, and coal. The fund employs a sampling strategy and maintains a modified equal-weighted approach with approximately 39 holdings. Top holdings have included Uranium Energy Corp., Hecla Mining Co., and Centrus Energy Corp. The expense ratio is 0.35%. The index rebalances quarterly. The fund distributes dividends quarterly and focuses exclusively on U.S.-listed securities.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The metals and mining sector operates within a macroeconomic environment shaped by commodity price cycles, global industrial demand, and energy transition trends. Capital flows into resource equities often respond to inflation expectations, supply constraints, and infrastructure spending. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards can influence both domestic and international producers. Geopolitical tensions affecting critical minerals supply chains and shifts in renewable energy adoption represent ongoing catalysts. Sector risks include commodity price volatility, operational challenges in extraction, and sensitivity to interest rate movements that affect capital-intensive projects.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) has exhibited performance tied to its active selection of global natural resources names, potentially offering differentiation during commodity upswings driven by specific company fundamentals. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has shown sensitivity to U.S. metals and mining earnings cycles and broader industrial production trends. Relative positioning highlights MGNR’s wider geographic reach versus XME’s concentrated U.S. equal-weighted exposure. Volatility differences arise from MGNR’s active concentration and XME’s equal-weight methodology, which can amplify smaller-company movements within the metals sector during rotation periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like MGNR and XME may explore the platform for additional analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest preference to SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) at present. The lower expense ratio, established passive framework, and equal-weighted diversification within the U.S. metals and mining segment support favorable positioning on cost efficiency and liquidity. American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) offers compelling active management and broader thematic scope, yet the higher fee and newer track record introduce incremental considerations around consistency and expense drag in a competitive resources environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MGNR vs. XME commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGNR is a Hold and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XME has more net assets: 4.7B vs. MGNR (1.3B). MGNR has a higher annual dividend yield than XME: MGNR (23.555) vs XME (9.814). MGNR was incepted earlier than XME: MGNR (3 years) vs XME (20 years). XME (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than MGNR (0.75). MGNR has a higher turnover XME (48.00) vs XME (48.00).
MGNRXMEMGNR / XME
Gain YTD23.5559.814240%
Net Assets1.3B4.7B28%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.35214%
Turnover80.0048.00167%
Yield0.750.32238%
Fund Existence3 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGNRXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
MGNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REQSX25.03N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Equity Income C
MNCEX13.95N/A
N/A
Mercer Non-US Core Equity Y3
RINTX54.72N/A
N/A
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts S
HULIX39.14N/A
N/A
Huber Select Large Cap Value Inv
FUEPX64.78-0.22
-0.34%
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-2

MGNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGNR has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGNR jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGNR
1D Price
Change %
MGNR100%
-0.22%
KGC - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
PAAS - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
CDE - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
AU - MGNR
74%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
CX - MGNR
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More

XME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XME
1D Price
Change %
XME100%
-0.99%
CDE - XME
77%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
MP - XME
71%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
NEM - XME
71%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
CLF - XME
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
CMP - XME
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
More