MGNR
Price
$46.47Alerts
Change
-$0.83 (-1.75%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Net Assets
1.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$95.25Alerts
Change
-$1.98 (-2.04%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Net Assets
3.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGNR vs XME

MGNR vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) vs. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • MGNR is an actively managed ETF targeting a broad range of natural resources companies, while XME passively tracks a modified equal-weighted index focused exclusively on U.S. metals and mining firms.
  • MGNR offers greater thematic diversification across metals, energy, agriculture-related, and chemicals, whereas XME concentrates on steel, aluminum, copper, gold, and related sub-industries.
  • MGNR carries a higher expense ratio of 0.75% compared to XME's 0.35%, reflecting its active strategy versus the latter's index-tracking approach.
  • MGNR typically holds 38–57 securities with top holdings representing diversified natural resources plays; XME maintains around 38 holdings under a modified equal-weight methodology that limits single-stock concentration.
  • Sector exposure in MGNR emphasizes materials and energy, while XME allocates heavily to industrials and basic materials within the metals and mining space.
  • Both ETFs provide exposure to commodity-linked equities but differ in liquidity profiles, rebalancing frequency, and sensitivity to sector-specific cycles such as metals prices versus broader natural resources trends.

Introduction

Investors seeking natural resources exposure often evaluate MGNR and XME as complementary or alternative options within the materials and energy complex. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent distinct strategies targeting overlapping yet differentiated segments of the natural resources universe. MGNR pursues active selection across a wide thematic mandate, while XME delivers systematic, equal-weighted access to U.S. metals and mining companies. The comparison highlights structural differences that influence diversification, cost, and responsiveness to commodity cycles and macroeconomic shifts.

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) Overview

The American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is an actively managed fund launched in February 2024. It seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of assets in equity securities of companies primarily engaged in natural resources and related businesses, including metals, energy, agricultural products, timber, water, and chemicals. The ETF typically holds 38–57 securities, with top holdings such as Range Resources Corp., ArcelorMittal SA, Smurfit Westrock PLC, Antero Resources Corp., and Vista Energy SAB de CV. Sector allocations center on materials (approximately 42–52%) and energy (approximately 23%), with additional exposure to consumer defensive and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As an active strategy, it employs fundamental research without tracking a specific index and features periodic rebalancing based on manager discretion.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

The SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is a passive ETF launched in June 2006 that seeks to track the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index. The index uses a modified equal-weight methodology across U.S. companies in sub-industries including aluminum, coal, copper, diversified metals and mining, gold, silver, and steel. The fund typically holds approximately 38 securities, with top holdings such as Reliance Inc., Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Steel Dynamics Inc., Nucor Corp., and Commercial Metals Company. Sector exposure concentrates in industrials (around 52%) and basic materials (around 36%), with smaller energy allocations. The expense ratio is 0.35%. Rebalancing occurs quarterly to maintain the equal-weight profile, supporting broad participation across market-cap segments within the metals and mining theme.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the natural resources and materials sectors, influenced by commodity price cycles, global industrial demand, and macroeconomic factors such as infrastructure spending and energy transition policies. Recent market cycles have featured volatility in metals prices driven by supply constraints, geopolitical developments, and shifting capital flows into mining and energy infrastructure. Regulatory developments around environmental standards and permitting for extraction projects continue to shape sector risks. Capital allocation trends favor companies demonstrating operational efficiency and resource diversification, while broader economic growth supports demand for steel, copper, and related materials. These dynamics create a backdrop where thematic breadth and cost efficiency become key differentiators for positioning.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, MGNR has exhibited performance tied to a wider array of natural resources themes, including energy and materials, potentially offering resilience during rotations favoring diversified commodity exposure. XME, with its equal-weighted metals and mining focus, has shown sensitivity to steel and precious metals cycles, delivering participation across large-, mid-, and small-cap names within the sector. Relative positioning highlights MGNR's broader diversification versus XME's concentrated yet balanced approach to U.S. mining equities. Volatility differences stem from MGNR's active selection and international holdings compared to XME's domestic, index-driven construction, influencing behavior during commodity price swings and sector rotations in recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine ETF comparisons and uncover additional opportunities aligned with specific investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to XME due to its lower expense ratio, established liquidity profile, modified equal-weight diversification within a focused metals and mining mandate, and consistent index methodology that aligns with sector momentum in materials. MGNR offers compelling thematic breadth for investors prioritizing active natural resources selection, though its higher cost and newer structure introduce different risk considerations. The assessment remains probabilistic and reflects relative positioning rather than definitive outperformance expectations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MGNR vs. XME commentary
Nov 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGNR is a Hold and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for MGNR with price predictions
Nov 12, 2026

MGNR sees its Stochastic Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory

On November 09, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for MGNR moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 27 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 25 of the 27 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MGNR's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 12 of 14 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MGNR just turned positive on November 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where MGNR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 21 of 25 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

Following a +4.06% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MGNR advanced for three days, in 190 of 203 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

MGNR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MGNR as a result. In 34 of 39 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The 50-day moving average for MGNR moved below the 200-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MGNR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.

The Aroon Indicator for MGNR entered a downward trend on November 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for XME with price predictions
Nov 12, 2026

XME in -6.55% downward trend, sliding for three consecutive days on November 05, 2026

Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where XME declined for three days, in 236 of 269 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on XME as a result. In 55 of 69 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

The Aroon Indicator for XME entered a downward trend on November 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where XME's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 29 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 49 of 52 cases where XME's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for XME just turned positive on November 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where XME's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 43 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Following a +9.03% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XME advanced for three days, in 333 of 361 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

XME may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGNRXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGNR has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGNR jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGNR
1D Price
Change %
MGNR100%
-1.76%
PAAS - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-4.12%
KGC - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
CDE - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
AU - MGNR
74%
Closely correlated
-4.78%
EQX - MGNR
73%
Closely correlated
-4.26%
More

XME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XME
1D Price
Change %
XME100%
-2.04%
CDE - XME
76%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
MP - XME
74%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
IDR - XME
71%
Closely correlated
-6.28%
NEM - XME
70%
Closely correlated
-4.92%
DC - XME
70%
Closely correlated
-5.54%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YOU56.791.38
+2.49%
Clear Secure
CSX52.400.50
+0.96%
CSX Corp
TV2.23-0.02
-0.89%
Grupo Televisa SA
NIPG3.48-0.10
-2.79%
NIP Group Inc.
BTBT0.77-0.03
-3.57%
Bit Digital