MGNR
Price
$46.73
Change
-$0.19 (-0.40%)
Updated
Oct 23, 11:11 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$95.47
Change
-$1.12 (-1.16%)
Updated
Oct 23, 11:29 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGNR vs XME

MGNR vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) vs. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • MGNR is an actively managed ETF targeting a broad range of natural resources companies, while XME passively tracks a modified equal-weighted index focused exclusively on U.S. metals and mining firms.
  • MGNR offers greater thematic diversification across metals, energy, agriculture-related, and chemicals, whereas XME concentrates on steel, aluminum, copper, gold, and related sub-industries.
  • MGNR carries a higher expense ratio of 0.75% compared to XME's 0.35%, reflecting its active strategy versus the latter's index-tracking approach.
  • MGNR typically holds 38–57 securities with top holdings representing diversified natural resources plays; XME maintains around 38 holdings under a modified equal-weight methodology that limits single-stock concentration.
  • Sector exposure in MGNR emphasizes materials and energy, while XME allocates heavily to industrials and basic materials within the metals and mining space.
  • Both ETFs provide exposure to commodity-linked equities but differ in liquidity profiles, rebalancing frequency, and sensitivity to sector-specific cycles such as metals prices versus broader natural resources trends.

Introduction

Investors seeking natural resources exposure often evaluate MGNR and XME as complementary or alternative options within the materials and energy complex. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent distinct strategies targeting overlapping yet differentiated segments of the natural resources universe. MGNR pursues active selection across a wide thematic mandate, while XME delivers systematic, equal-weighted access to U.S. metals and mining companies. The comparison highlights structural differences that influence diversification, cost, and responsiveness to commodity cycles and macroeconomic shifts.

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) Overview

The American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) is an actively managed fund launched in February 2024. It seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of assets in equity securities of companies primarily engaged in natural resources and related businesses, including metals, energy, agricultural products, timber, water, and chemicals. The ETF typically holds 38–57 securities, with top holdings such as Range Resources Corp., ArcelorMittal SA, Smurfit Westrock PLC, Antero Resources Corp., and Vista Energy SAB de CV. Sector allocations center on materials (approximately 42–52%) and energy (approximately 23%), with additional exposure to consumer defensive and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As an active strategy, it employs fundamental research without tracking a specific index and features periodic rebalancing based on manager discretion.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

The SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is a passive ETF launched in June 2006 that seeks to track the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index. The index uses a modified equal-weight methodology across U.S. companies in sub-industries including aluminum, coal, copper, diversified metals and mining, gold, silver, and steel. The fund typically holds approximately 38 securities, with top holdings such as Reliance Inc., Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Steel Dynamics Inc., Nucor Corp., and Commercial Metals Company. Sector exposure concentrates in industrials (around 52%) and basic materials (around 36%), with smaller energy allocations. The expense ratio is 0.35%. Rebalancing occurs quarterly to maintain the equal-weight profile, supporting broad participation across market-cap segments within the metals and mining theme.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the natural resources and materials sectors, influenced by commodity price cycles, global industrial demand, and macroeconomic factors such as infrastructure spending and energy transition policies. Recent market cycles have featured volatility in metals prices driven by supply constraints, geopolitical developments, and shifting capital flows into mining and energy infrastructure. Regulatory developments around environmental standards and permitting for extraction projects continue to shape sector risks. Capital allocation trends favor companies demonstrating operational efficiency and resource diversification, while broader economic growth supports demand for steel, copper, and related materials. These dynamics create a backdrop where thematic breadth and cost efficiency become key differentiators for positioning.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, MGNR has exhibited performance tied to a wider array of natural resources themes, including energy and materials, potentially offering resilience during rotations favoring diversified commodity exposure. XME, with its equal-weighted metals and mining focus, has shown sensitivity to steel and precious metals cycles, delivering participation across large-, mid-, and small-cap names within the sector. Relative positioning highlights MGNR's broader diversification versus XME's concentrated yet balanced approach to U.S. mining equities. Volatility differences stem from MGNR's active selection and international holdings compared to XME's domestic, index-driven construction, influencing behavior during commodity price swings and sector rotations in recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine ETF comparisons and uncover additional opportunities aligned with specific investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to XME due to its lower expense ratio, established liquidity profile, modified equal-weight diversification within a focused metals and mining mandate, and consistent index methodology that aligns with sector momentum in materials. MGNR offers compelling thematic breadth for investors prioritizing active natural resources selection, though its higher cost and newer structure introduce different risk considerations. The assessment remains probabilistic and reflects relative positioning rather than definitive outperformance expectations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MGNR vs. XME commentary
Oct 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGNR is a Hold and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for MGNR with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

MGNR's RSI Oscillator stoops into oversold zone

The RSI Indicator for MGNR moved into overbought territory on October 22, 2026. Be on the watch for a price drop or consolidation in the future -- when this happens, think about selling the stock or exploring put options.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

Following a +1.14% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MGNR advanced for three days, in 190 of 201 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

MGNR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MGNR as a result. In 35 of 39 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

MGNR moved below its 50-day moving average on September 24, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for MGNR crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 7 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MGNR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.

The Aroon Indicator for MGNR entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for XME with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

XME in downward trend: 10-day moving average moved below 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026

The 10-day moving average for XME crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for XME turned negative on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 38 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.

XME moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where XME declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Aroon Indicator for XME entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for XME's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

Following a +2.36% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XME advanced for three days, in 337 of 363 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

XME may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGNRXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
MGNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGNR has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGNR jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGNR
1D Price
Change %
MGNR100%
-3.08%
PAAS - MGNR
78%
Closely correlated
-5.91%
KGC - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-4.79%
CDE - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-8.26%
AU - MGNR
75%
Closely correlated
-6.89%
EQX - MGNR
74%
Closely correlated
-6.16%
More

XME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XME
1D Price
Change %
XME100%
-4.64%
CDE - XME
77%
Closely correlated
-8.26%
MP - XME
73%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
NEM - XME
72%
Closely correlated
-2.62%
DC - XME
70%
Closely correlated
-5.53%
CTGO - XME
70%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDEV22.000.33
+1.52%
First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV)
PFL6.730.02
+0.30%
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
IDYN29.62-0.34
-1.15%
iShares International Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (IDYN)
ASMF26.54-0.53
-1.94%
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
RPG53.18-2.34
-4.21%
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG)