Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGWRX vs NPFFX
MGWRX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MGWRX vs NPFFX
MGWRX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGWRX vs. NPFFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGWRX is a Hold and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGWRX (799M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MGWRX: NPFFX (0.92) vs MGWRX (0.00). MGWRX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MGWRX (23 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). MGWRX (1.56) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). NPFFX (23.00) and MGWRX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGWRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFFX: MGWRX (0) vs NPFFX (250). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.13 vs. MGWRX (-2.89). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.82 vs. MGWRX (-6.21).
| MGWRX | NPFFX | MGWRX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.77 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.77 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.796 | 4.401 | -86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 799M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.89 | 10.13 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.66 | 38.91 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.21 | 12.82 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.92 | 119.52 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement