MHO
Price
$141.33
Change
-$0.62 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
3.62B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TOL
Price
$147.10
Change
-$0.11 (-0.07%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
13.75B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MHO vs TOL

Header iconMHO vs TOL Comparison
Open Charts MHO vs TOLBanner chart's image
MHO vs TOL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) vs. Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both MHO and TOL are prominent homebuilders, but MHO focuses on mid‑range single‑family homes while TOL targets luxury segments.
  • MHO’s recent price decline has been deeper than TOL’s, driven by slower regional demand and higher inventory levels.
  • TOL enjoys stronger balance‑sheet metrics (lower debt‑to‑equity, higher cash conversion) and a modest dividend yield, giving it a defensive edge.
  • Analyst sentiment favors TOL’s earnings momentum, whereas MHO faces cautious outlooks due to muted growth in its northern markets.
  • AI trading bots on Tickeron tend to prioritize TOL for trend consistency, while MHO appears in risk‑adjusted swing‑trade strategies.

Introduction

Homebuilding stocks often react sharply to housing‑market dynamics, mortgage rates, and regional supply constraints. This comparison pits M/I Homes, Inc. MHO against Toll Brothers, Inc. TOL, two publicly traded builders with different market positions. The analysis is relevant for value‑oriented investors, growth‑seeking traders, and anyone using algorithmic tools that monitor sector rotation in the residential real‑estate space.

MHO Overview and Recent Performance

M/I Homes, Inc. MHO builds and sells single‑family homes across the Midwest, South and select West Coast markets. In recent weeks the stock has slipped roughly 10%‑12% from its 52‑week high, reflecting a combination of higher inventory in the northern markets, modest land‑cost inflation, and a slight dip in builder confidence reported by the NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Index.

Key developments include the company’s expanded mortgage‑service platform, which now accounts for about 12% of total revenue, and a $100 million increase to its share‑repurchase authorization announced earlier in the quarter. Earnings for the most recent reporting period showed revenue of $1.15 billion (down ~4% YoY) and a net margin of 5.8%, modestly above the prior quarter. The firm’s beta (a measure of volatility relative to the market) stands at 0.45, indicating lower price swings than the broader market.

TOL Overview and Recent Performance

Toll Brothers, Inc. TOL specializes in luxury home construction and operates in more than 60 U.S. markets, covering the North, Mid‑Atlantic, South, Mountain and Pacific regions. Over the same period, TOL’s share price has fallen about 4%‑5% from its peak, outperforming MHO’s decline. The broader luxury‑home demand rebound, driven by higher‑income buyer confidence, has cushioned the stock.

Recent highlights: a 15% YoY revenue rise to $2.15 billion, a net margin of 9.1%, and an EPS (earnings per share) of $14.00. The company’s balance sheet shows a debt‑to‑equity ratio of 32.4% (well below many peers) and a cash‑to‑debt ratio that supports continued dividend payments of $0.26 per share (yield ≈0.74%). TOL’s beta of 1.39 suggests a higher sensitivity to market moves, yet its stable cash flow and modest dividend add a defensive layer for investors.

Trending AI Robots

The Trending AI Robots page on Tickeron curates a selection of the platform’s most performant algorithmic bots from a library of hundreds that trade thousands of tickers. These bots span a range of strategies—momentum, mean‑reversion, AI‑driven sentiment, and multi‑timeframe approaches—with back‑tested win rates often between 55% and 70% and Sharpe ratios (risk‑adjusted return metric) above 1.2. Only the bots that demonstrate consistent edge under current market conditions earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section, offering traders a quick entry point to capitalize on sector‑specific opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

  • Business Model: MHO focuses on volume‑driven, mid‑price homes; TOL emphasizes luxury, high‑margin projects and ancillary services (mortgage, title, smart‑home tech).
  • Growth Drivers: MHO’s growth hinges on expanding land inventories in the South and boosting its financial‑services segment; TOL benefits from premium pricing power and recent acquisitions in high‑growth markets.
  • Recent Momentum: TOL shows steadier price performance and stronger earnings beat expectations; MHO’s momentum is more volatile due to regional demand fluctuations.
  • Risk Factors: MHO faces exposure to slower housing starts in the Midwest and higher sensitivity to interest‑rate hikes; TOL’s risks include luxury‑segment softness and higher construction‑cost inflation.
  • Financial Health: TOL’s lower debt‑to‑equity and dividend payout provide a buffer in a tightening credit environment, whereas MHO’s stronger cash flow conversion supports its share‑buyback program.
  • Market Sentiment: Analyst coverage tilts slightly bullish for TOL (average rating “Buy”), while MHO holds a “Neutral” consensus, reflecting caution over its regional exposure.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trends—stable earnings, stronger balance‑sheet ratios, and a modest dividend—Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a marginally higher probability of outperformance to TOL. The algorithm favors stocks with consistent momentum and defensive financial metrics, both of which align with TOL’s recent profile. MHO remains attractive for traders seeking higher volatility and potential upside from a regional recovery, but the AI’s probability weighting leans toward TOL for the near term.

Disclaimer

“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.”

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MHO vs. TOL commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHO is a StrongBuy and TOL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (MHO: $141.33 vs. TOL: $147.10)
Brand notoriety: MHO and TOL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MHO: 88% vs. TOL: 113%
Market capitalization -- MHO: $3.62B vs. TOL: $13.75B
MHO [@Homebuilding] is valued at $3.62B. TOL’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $13.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $43.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MHO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTOL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MHO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TOL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MHO is a better buy in the long-term than TOL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MHO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MHO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TOL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TOL is a better buy in the short-term than MHO.

Price Growth

MHO (@Homebuilding) experienced а +2.91% price change this week, while TOL (@Homebuilding) price change was +6.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

MHO is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

TOL is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+2.75% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOL($13.7B) has a higher market cap than MHO($3.62B). TOL has higher P/E ratio than MHO: TOL (11.18) vs MHO (10.62). MHO YTD gains are higher at: 10.457 vs. TOL (9.189). TOL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.7B vs. MHO (516M). TOL has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. MHO (767M). MHO has less debt than TOL: MHO (1.01B) vs TOL (2.92B). TOL has higher revenues than MHO: TOL (11B) vs MHO (4.36B).
MHOTOLMHO / TOL
Capitalization3.62B13.7B26%
EBITDA516M1.7B30%
Gain YTD10.4579.189114%
P/E Ratio10.6211.1895%
Revenue4.36B11B40%
Total Cash767M1.11B69%
Total Debt1.01B2.92B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MHO vs TOL: Fundamental Ratings
MHO
TOL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7966
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4843
SMR RATING
1..100
6755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1225
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MHO's Valuation (42) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as TOL (67). This means that MHO’s stock grew similarly to TOL’s over the last 12 months.

TOL's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MHO (48). This means that TOL’s stock grew similarly to MHO’s over the last 12 months.

TOL's SMR Rating (55) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MHO (67). This means that TOL’s stock grew similarly to MHO’s over the last 12 months.

TOL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MHO (46). This means that TOL’s stock grew similarly to MHO’s over the last 12 months.

MHO's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as TOL (25). This means that MHO’s stock grew similarly to TOL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MHOTOL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MHO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TOL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REG80.280.35
+0.43%
Regency Centers Corp
TRC19.260.04
+0.21%
Tejon Ranch Co
BGSI95.810.20
+0.21%
Boyd Group Services Inc.
PFX43.85N/A
N/A
PhenixFIN Corp
SNYR0.20-0.01
-2.97%
Synergy CHC Corp

MHO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MHO has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MHO jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHO
1D Price
Change %
MHO100%
-0.44%
MTH - MHO
86%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
KBH - MHO
86%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
PHM - MHO
85%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
GRBK - MHO
85%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
TOL - MHO
84%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
More

TOL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOL has been closely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TOL jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOL
1D Price
Change %
TOL100%
-0.07%
PHM - TOL
90%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
MTH - TOL
86%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
DHI - TOL
86%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
KBH - TOL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
LEN - TOL
84%
Closely correlated
-4.90%
More