Advertisement
MHO vs PHM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? M/I Homes (MHO) vs. PulteGroup (PHM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- M/I Homes (MHO) and PulteGroup (PHM) are both leading U.S. homebuilders with exposure to the residential construction sector, making them sensitive to interest rates, housing demand, and economic conditions.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks reflecting broader housing sector trends, with performance influenced by mortgage rates and consumer sentiment toward home purchases.
- PulteGroup (PHM) operates on a larger scale with multiple brands and greater geographic diversification compared to M/I Homes (MHO)'s more focused regional presence.
- Relative performance in recent weeks has highlighted differences in momentum, with stability and order trends serving as key differentiators between the two.
- Risk factors for both include interest rate volatility and supply chain considerations, though PulteGroup (PHM)'s size may offer some buffering in market swings.
- Sector exposure remains aligned for both, centered on new home construction and related economic indicators.
Introduction
Investors and traders comparing homebuilder equities often examine M/I Homes (MHO) and PulteGroup (PHM) due to their shared position in the residential construction industry. This stock comparison provides a factual overview of their business models, recent market positioning, and relative performance characteristics. The analysis is particularly relevant for those monitoring housing sector dynamics, interest rate impacts, and cyclical equity opportunities within consumer discretionary segments.
MHO Overview and Recent Performance
M/I Homes (MHO) designs, constructs, and sells single-family homes primarily in select U.S. markets, targeting entry-level and move-up buyers. In recent weeks, the stock has tracked broader housing sector movements, with sentiment shaped by mortgage rate fluctuations and regional demand patterns. Market activity reflects ongoing adjustments to economic indicators, including employment data and consumer confidence levels affecting home affordability.
PHM Overview and Recent Performance
PulteGroup (PHM) is a major homebuilder operating through brands such as Pulte Homes and Centex, with a wide national footprint. Recent market activity for the stock has aligned with industry trends, influenced by similar factors around financing costs and buyer activity. Performance in recent weeks has been guided by order trends and operational scale, amid the same macroeconomic environment impacting the sector.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. The section highlights only the most suitable options based on observable statistics and adaptability, providing users with insights into diverse trading styles and sets of instruments. All bots feature distinct approaches to risk management and signal generation. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for additional details on available configurations.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business model terms, PulteGroup (PHM) maintains a larger operational scale and multi-brand structure, offering wider geographic reach than M/I Homes (MHO)'s more concentrated market focus. Growth drivers for both center on housing starts and buyer demand, though PulteGroup (PHM) may benefit from greater diversification in regional exposure. Recent momentum has shown both equities responding to sector-wide catalysts, with differences emerging in consistency of trends and positioning relative to peers. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity for the industry as a whole, where PulteGroup (PHM)'s size could provide relative stability. Market sentiment remains tied to macroeconomic data, creating trade-offs between M/I Homes (MHO)'s agility in specific markets and PulteGroup (PHM)'s broader resilience.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, operational stability, and relative market positioning, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probability to PulteGroup (PHM) in this comparison. The assessment considers the company’s scale and diversification as potential advantages in navigating recent sector conditions, though outcomes remain probabilistic and dependent on evolving data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHO is a Hold and PHM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MHO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MHO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MHO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MHO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PHM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MHO (@Homebuilding) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while PHM (@Homebuilding) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
MHO is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PHM is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Homebuilding (-1.84% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| MHO | PHM | MHO / PHM | |
| Capitalization | 3.83B | 24.5B | 16% |
| EBITDA | 516M | 2.79B | 18% |
| Gain YTD | 17.100 | 10.266 | 167% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.26 | 13.15 | 86% |
| Revenue | 4.36B | 16.8B | 26% |
| Total Cash | 767M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.01B | 2.28B | 44% |
MHO | PHM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 12 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MHO's Valuation (42) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (66). This means that MHO’s stock grew similarly to PHM’s over the last 12 months.
PHM's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MHO (39). This means that PHM’s stock grew similarly to MHO’s over the last 12 months.
PHM's SMR Rating (54) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MHO (66). This means that PHM’s stock grew similarly to MHO’s over the last 12 months.
MHO's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (54). This means that MHO’s stock grew similarly to PHM’s over the last 12 months.
MHO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (19). This means that MHO’s stock grew similarly to PHM’s over the last 12 months.
| MHO | PHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 8 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFLV | 40.61 | 0.28 | +0.68% |
| Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| FTHY | 13.56 | 0.04 | +0.30% |
| First Trust High Yield Opportunities 2027 Term Fund | |||
| AGRW | 31.47 | N/A | N/A |
| Allspring LT Large Growth ETF | |||
| HERD | 48.01 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | |||
| ELCV | 32.09 | -0.18 | -0.57% |
| Eventide High Dividend ETF | |||
MHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MHO has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MHO jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.
PHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHM has been closely correlated with DHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHM jumps, then DHI could also see price increases.