Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICFX vs TRCLX
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.97
Change-$0.07 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.75M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.72
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.25M
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 441M vs. TRCLX (61.3M). MICFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICFX (1.53) vs TRCLX (1.39). MICFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICFX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICFX (49.99). MICFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICFX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 65.62 vs. TRCLX (47.81). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.47 vs. MICFX (-21.91).
| MICFX | TRCLX | MICFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.03 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 2.10 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.905 | 29.924 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 61.3M | 719% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.39 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 65.62 | 47.81 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.15 | 20.27 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.91 | 1.47 | -1,492% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.80 | N/A | - |