Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICFX vs TRCLX
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Instl
Price$14.99
Change-$0.10 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets359.39M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.62
Change+$0.05 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.51M
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 359M vs. TRCLX (45.5M). MICFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICFX (1.87) vs TRCLX (1.69). MICFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICFX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICFX (49.99). MICFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICFX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.49 vs. TRCLX (12.29). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.17 vs. MICFX (-26.13).
| MICFX | TRCLX | MICFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.03 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 2.10 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.444 | 9.564 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 45.5M | 789% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.69 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.49 | 12.29 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.79 | -9.71 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.13 | -2.17 | 1,204% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement