Ad is loading...
MICFX vs TRCLX
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Instl
Price$13.36
Change+$0.09 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets392.43M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.45
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40M
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 392M vs. TRCLX (40M). MICFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICFX (1.78) vs TRCLX (1.68). MICFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICFX (14 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.01). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICFX (49.60). MICFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICFX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.80 vs. TRCLX (4.00). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 2.29 vs. MICFX (-25.73).
| MICFX | TRCLX | MICFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.03 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.10 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.447 | -1.042 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 392M | 40M | 980% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.68 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.80 | 4.00 | 595% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.51 | -11.64 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.73 | 2.29 | -1,121% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers