Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICFX vs TRCLX
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICFX vs TRCLX
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICFX is a StrongBuy and TRCLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 398M vs. TRCLX (102M). MICFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICFX (1.45) vs TRCLX (1.15). MICFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICFX (16 years) vs TRCLX (7 years). TRCLX (1.73) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.13). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. MICFX (36.73). MICFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICFX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.54 vs. MICFX (5.57). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.95 vs. MICFX (-34.04).
| MICFX | TRCLX | MICFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.03 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.73 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.201 | 18.728 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 102M | 390% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.15 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.57 | 39.54 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.62 | 51.88 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.04 | 1.95 | -1,746% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement