MJGCF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
70.79M
MNDJF
Price
$3.44
Change
+$0.01 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
118.5M
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MJGCF vs MNDJF

Header iconMJGCF vs MNDJF Comparison
Open Charts MJGCF vs MNDJFBanner chart's image
Majestic Gold
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization70.79M
Mandalay Resources
Price$3.44
Change+$0.01 (+0.29%)
Volume$24.46K
Capitalization118.5M
MJGCF vs MNDJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MJGCF vs. MNDJF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MJGCF is a Hold and MNDJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MJGCF: $0.12 vs. MNDJF: $3.44)
Brand notoriety: MJGCF and MNDJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MJGCF: 51% vs. MNDJF: 77%
Market capitalization -- MJGCF: $70.79M vs. MNDJF: $118.5M
MJGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $70.79M. MNDJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $118.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MJGCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNDJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MJGCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNDJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNDJF is a better buy in the long-term than MJGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MJGCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNDJF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MJGCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNDJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MJGCF is a better buy in the short-term than MNDJF.

Price Growth

MJGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.44% price change this week, while MNDJF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNDJF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNDJF($118M) has a higher market cap than MJGCF($70.8M). MJGCF has higher P/E ratio than MNDJF: MJGCF (25.58) vs MNDJF (8.47). MJGCF YTD gains are higher at: 115.213 vs. MNDJF (26.104). MNDJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 63.6M vs. MJGCF (31.9M). MJGCF has more cash in the bank: 58.2M vs. MNDJF (36.5M). MJGCF has less debt than MNDJF: MJGCF (4.44M) vs MNDJF (23.5M). MNDJF has higher revenues than MJGCF: MNDJF (180M) vs MJGCF (60.1M).
MJGCFMNDJFMJGCF / MNDJF
Capitalization70.8M118M60%
EBITDA31.9M63.6M50%
Gain YTD115.21326.104441%
P/E Ratio25.588.47302%
Revenue60.1M180M33%
Total Cash58.2M36.5M159%
Total Debt4.44M23.5M19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MJGCF vs MNDJF: Fundamental Ratings
MJGCF
MNDJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2742
SMR RATING
1..100
7039
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
496
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNDJF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MJGCF (62). This means that MNDJF’s stock grew similarly to MJGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MJGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as MNDJF (42). This means that MJGCF’s stock grew similarly to MNDJF’s over the last 12 months.

MNDJF's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as MJGCF (70). This means that MNDJF’s stock grew similarly to MJGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MJGCF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as MNDJF (45). This means that MJGCF’s stock grew similarly to MNDJF’s over the last 12 months.

MJGCF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNDJF (96). This means that MJGCF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNDJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MJGCFMNDJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACNDF0.860.03
+4.11%
Ascendas India Trust
BLNC0.15N/A
N/A
Balance Labs, Inc.
DCYHY27.15N/A
N/A
Discovery Holdings Ltd.
PUKPF12.43N/A
N/A
Prudential PLC
BKUT496.50N/A
N/A
Bank of Utica (NY)

MJGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MJGCF and PMDRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MJGCF and PMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJGCF
1D Price
Change %
MJGCF100%
-0.13%
PMDRF - MJGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.69%
IMRFF - MJGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VIORF - MJGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MMRGF - MJGCF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
MNDJF - MJGCF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More

MNDJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNDJF and AG have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNDJF and AG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNDJF
1D Price
Change %
MNDJF100%
+0.20%
AG - MNDJF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
HL - MNDJF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
PAAS - MNDJF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGI - MNDJF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
EGO - MNDJF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More