Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCMX vs PBCAX
MKCMX vs PBCAX Comparison
Open Charts MKCMX vs PBCAX
MKCMX vs PBCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCMX vs. PBCAX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCMX is a Hold and PBCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKCMX has more cash in the bank: 2.4B vs. PBCAX (390M). MKCMX pays higher dividends than PBCAX: MKCMX (3.86) vs PBCAX (2.93). MKCMX was incepted earlier than PBCAX: MKCMX (9 years) vs PBCAX (36 years). PBCAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than MKCMX (0.42). MKCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. PBCAX (43.00). PBCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCMX: PBCAX (1000) vs MKCMX (5000000). PBCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.27 vs. MKCMX (-0.46). MKCMX return over 5 years is better than : 2.73 vs. PBCAX (-0.55).
| MKCMX | PBCAX | MKCMX / PBCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.68 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.75 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.225 | -1.624 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 390M | 616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.86 | 2.93 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.46 | -0.27 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.95 | 8.53 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.73 | -0.55 | -495% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement