Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCMX vs PCIZX
MKCMX vs PCIZX Comparison
Open Charts MKCMX vs PCIZX
MKCMX vs PCIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCMX vs. PCIZX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCMX is a Hold and PCIZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKCMX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. PCIZX (394M). MKCMX pays higher dividends than PCIZX: MKCMX (3.74) vs PCIZX (3.19). MKCMX was incepted earlier than PCIZX: MKCMX (8 years) vs PCIZX (30 years). PCIZX (0.55) is less costly to investors than MKCMX (0.42). MKCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. PCIZX (43.00). PCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCMX: PCIZX (0) vs MKCMX (5000000). MKCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.42 vs. PCIZX (5.91). MKCMX return over 5 years is better than : 6.47 vs. PCIZX (3.72).
| MKCMX | PCIZX | MKCMX / PCIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.39 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.55 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.063 | 1.027 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 394M | 627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 3.19 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 5.91 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.35 | 12.28 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.47 | 3.72 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement