Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCPX vs RLEFX
MKCPX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MKCPX vs RLEFX
MKCPX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCPX vs. RLEFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCPX is a Buy and RLEFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MKCPX (1.8B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than RLEFX: MKCPX (2.46) vs RLEFX (1.95). MKCPX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MKCPX (9 years) vs RLEFX (11 years). MKCPX (0.48) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RLEFX (50.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: RLEFX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.87 vs. MKCPX (2.20). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.60 vs. MKCPX (8.37).
| MKCPX | RLEFX | MKCPX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.39 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.39 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.200 | 8.624 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 1.95 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.20 | 6.87 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.02 | 42.25 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.37 | 32.60 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement