Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKFOX vs RGAHX
MKFOX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MKFOX vs RGAHX
MKFOX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKFOX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKFOX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MKFOX (1.73B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MKFOX: RGAHX (0.40) vs MKFOX (0.00). MKFOX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MKFOX (7 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). MKFOX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MKFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKFOX: RGAHX (250) vs MKFOX (5000000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. MKFOX (-13.61). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. MKFOX (-0.12).
| MKFOX | RGAHX | MKFOX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.44 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.44 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.288 | 9.200 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.61 | 0.18 | -7,580% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.16 | 43.47 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.12 | 13.78 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement