Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKLOX vs RLBAX
MKLOX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MKLOX vs RLBAX
MKLOX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKLOX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKLOX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MKLOX (17.1B). MKLOX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MKLOX (3.09) vs RLBAX (1.12). MKLOX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MKLOX (10 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than MKLOX (0.80). MKLOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 130.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKLOX: RLBAX (250) vs MKLOX (5000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.10 vs. MKLOX (3.53). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.08 vs. MKLOX (3.47).
| MKLOX | RLBAX | MKLOX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.32 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.595 | 7.371 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 285B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 1.12 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.53 | 5.10 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.87 | 38.04 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.47 | 27.08 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | 73.89 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers