Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLAAX vs RGAFX
MLAAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MLAAX vs RGAFX
MLAAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLAAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLAAX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MLAAX (12.6B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MLAAX: RGAFX (0.46) vs MLAAX (0.00). MLAAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MLAAX (31 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). MLAAX (0.95) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). MLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLAAX: RGAFX (250) vs MLAAX (15000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.67 vs. MLAAX (-13.36). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. MLAAX (-34.39).
| MLAAX | RGAFX | MLAAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.34 | 276% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.34 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.299 | 7.299 | 45% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 357B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.36 | 4.67 | -286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.11 | 40.73 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.39 | 17.46 | -197% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.94 | 105.95 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement