Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLAAX vs RGEBX
MLAAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MLAAX vs RGEBX
MLAAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLAAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLAAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLAAX (12.4B). MLAAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLAAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MLAAX (31 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than MLAAX (0.95). MLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLAAX: RGEBX (250) vs MLAAX (15000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.59 vs. MLAAX (-11.44). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.58 vs. MLAAX (-30.50).
| MLAAX | RGEBX | MLAAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.08 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.08 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.162 | 6.379 | 34% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 361B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.44 | 7.59 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.42 | 41.56 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.50 | 14.58 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.67 | 100.04 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers