Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLAAX vs RGEBX
MLAAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MLAAX vs RGEBX
MLAAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLAAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLAAX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. MLAAX (11.8B). MLAAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLAAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MLAAX (31 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than MLAAX (0.95). MLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLAAX: RGEBX (250) vs MLAAX (15000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. MLAAX (-13.31). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 13.60 vs. MLAAX (-36.04).
| MLAAX | RGEBX | MLAAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.08 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.08 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.958 | 9.105 | 32% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 342B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.31 | 4.65 | -286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.50 | 43.99 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.04 | 13.60 | -265% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.94 | 92.84 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers