Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLAAX vs RGEBX
MLAAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MLAAX vs RGEBX
MLAAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLAAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLAAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MLAAX (12.6B). MLAAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLAAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MLAAX (31 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than MLAAX (0.95). MLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLAAX: RGEBX (250) vs MLAAX (15000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. MLAAX (-13.36). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.32 vs. MLAAX (-34.39).
| MLAAX | RGEBX | MLAAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.08 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.08 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.299 | 6.888 | 48% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 357B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.36 | 3.42 | -391% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.11 | 36.26 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.39 | 12.32 | -279% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.94 | 93.96 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers