Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLACX vs RGAFX
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MLACX vs RGAFX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.89
Change-$0.02 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.89B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$88.83
Change+$0.04 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLACX vs. RGAFX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLACX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. MLACX (13.9B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: RGAFX (0.53) vs MLACX (0.00). MLACX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MLACX (21 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: RGAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.13 vs. MLACX (-18.64). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.15 vs. MLACX (-43.14).
| MLACX | RGAFX | MLACX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.34 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.34 | 556% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.986 | 19.363 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 341B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.64 | 16.13 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.60 | 69.07 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.14 | 49.15 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.20 | 110.40 | -42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement