Ad is loading...
MLACX vs RGAFX
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MLACX vs RGAFX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$3.74
Change-$0.16 (-4.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.04B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$66.13
Change-$2.72 (-3.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLACX vs. RGAFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLACX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. MLACX (12B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: RGAFX (0.66) vs MLACX (0.00). MLACX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MLACX (20 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: RGAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.74 vs. MLACX (-32.85). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.56 vs. MLACX (-41.47).
| MLACX | RGAFX | MLACX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.34 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.34 | 556% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.821 | -7.485 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 272B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.66 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -32.85 | -1.74 | 1,886% |
| Returns for 3 years | -40.82 | 9.85 | -414% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.47 | 52.56 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -60.71 | 56.31 | -108% |