Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLACX vs RGAFX
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MLACX vs RGAFX
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLACX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLACX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLACX (12.7B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: RGAFX (0.46) vs MLACX (0.00). MLACX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MLACX (21 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). MLACX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: RGAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.49 vs. MLACX (-35.71). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.71 vs. MLACX (-70.46).
| MLACX | RGAFX | MLACX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.34 | 544% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.34 | 547% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.727 | 8.854 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 361B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -35.71 | 12.49 | -286% |
| Returns for 3 years | -44.19 | 50.06 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -70.46 | 20.71 | -340% |
| Returns for 10 years | -62.60 | 121.55 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement