Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLACX vs RGAFX
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MLACX vs RGAFX
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLACX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLACX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MLACX (11.5B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: RGAFX (0.46) vs MLACX (0.00). MLACX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MLACX (21 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). MLACX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: RGAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. MLACX (-42.03). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.74 vs. MLACX (-73.71).
| MLACX | RGAFX | MLACX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.34 | 544% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.34 | 547% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.818 | 9.276 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -42.03 | 0.42 | -10,046% |
| Returns for 3 years | -47.27 | 44.36 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -73.71 | 14.74 | -500% |
| Returns for 10 years | -65.60 | 109.80 | -60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement