MLCO
Price
$5.89
Change
-$0.04 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.3B
67 days until earnings call
SJMHF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.03 (+11.11%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLCO vs SJMHF

Header iconMLCO vs SJMHF Comparison
Open Charts MLCO vs SJMHFBanner chart's image
Melco Resorts & Entertainment
Price$5.89
Change-$0.04 (-0.67%)
Volume$3.31M
Capitalization3.3B
SJM Holdings
Price$0.30
Change+$0.03 (+11.11%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization3.28B
MLCO vs SJMHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLCO vs. SJMHF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLCO is a StrongBuy and SJMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MLCO: $5.89 vs. SJMHF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: MLCO: Notable vs. SJMHF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLCO: 75% vs. SJMHF: 162%
Market capitalization -- MLCO: $3.3B vs. SJMHF: $3.28B
MLCO [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $3.3B. SJMHF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $3.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLCO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSJMHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MLCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SJMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SJMHF is a better buy in the long-term than MLCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLCO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MLCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MLCO (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -6.21% price change this week, while SJMHF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLCO is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

SJMHF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.92% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLCO($3.3B) and SJMHF($3.28B) have the same market capitalization . MLCO YTD gains are higher at: 1.727 vs. SJMHF (-8.731). MLCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 634M vs. SJMHF (-4.72B). SJMHF has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. MLCO (1.31B). MLCO has less debt than SJMHF: MLCO (7.77B) vs SJMHF (26.8B). SJMHF has higher revenues than MLCO: SJMHF (5.46B) vs MLCO (3.78B).
MLCOSJMHFMLCO / SJMHF
Capitalization3.3B3.28B101%
EBITDA634M-4.72B-13%
Gain YTD1.727-8.731-20%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3.78B5.46B69%
Total Cash1.31B2.26B58%
Total Debt7.77B26.8B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLCO vs SJMHF: Fundamental Ratings
MLCO
SJMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6942
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9892
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8152
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLCO's Valuation (81) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (99) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

MLCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (100) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (98) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (57) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (81) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNPEX66.340.41
+0.62%
American Funds New Perspective R4
IENIX29.74N/A
N/A
Invesco Energy R5
GIFFX21.59N/A
N/A
Invesco Growth and Income R6
PIIIX15.21N/A
N/A
Principal Diversified Intl Inst
NCVLX11.78N/A
N/A
Nuance Concentrated Value Institutional

MLCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLCO has been closely correlated with LVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLCO jumps, then LVS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLCO
1D Price
Change %
MLCO100%
-0.67%
LVS - MLCO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
WYNN - MLCO
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
SCHYY - MLCO
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
GXYYY - MLCO
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
WYNMY - MLCO
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
More

SJMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHF has been loosely correlated with SJMHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHF jumps, then SJMHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJMHF
1D Price
Change %
SJMHF100%
N/A
SJMHY - SJMHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GXYYY - SJMHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
SCHYF - SJMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLCO - SJMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
WYNN - SJMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
More