MLCO
Price
$10.08
Change
+$0.18 (+1.82%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.93B
75 days until earnings call
SJMHF
Price
$0.43
Change
+$0.03 (+7.50%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLCO vs SJMHF

Header iconMLCO vs SJMHF Comparison
Open Charts MLCO vs SJMHFBanner chart's image
Melco Resorts & Entertainment
Price$10.08
Change+$0.18 (+1.82%)
Volume$96.17K
Capitalization3.93B
SJM Holdings
Price$0.43
Change+$0.03 (+7.50%)
Volume$190
Capitalization3.06B
MLCO vs SJMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLCO vs. SJMHF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLCO is a StrongBuy and SJMHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MLCO: $9.90 vs. SJMHF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: MLCO: Notable vs. SJMHF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLCO: 97% vs. SJMHF: 11%
Market capitalization -- MLCO: $3.93B vs. SJMHF: $3.04B
MLCO [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $3.93B. SJMHF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $39.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSJMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SJMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MLCO and SJMHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJMHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SJMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SJMHF is a better buy in the short-term than MLCO.

Price Growth

MLCO (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +10.49% price change this week, while SJMHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +9.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +3.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+3.84% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLCO($3.93B) has a higher market cap than SJMHF($3.06B). SJMHF has higher P/E ratio than MLCO: SJMHF (8481.40) vs MLCO (71.42). MLCO YTD gains are higher at: 70.984 vs. SJMHF (32.096).
MLCOSJMHFMLCO / SJMHF
Capitalization3.93B3.06B128%
EBITDA1.05BN/A-
Gain YTD70.98432.096221%
P/E Ratio71.428481.401%
Revenue4.93BN/A-
Total Cash1.12BN/A-
Total Debt7.46BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLCO vs SJMHF: Fundamental Ratings
MLCO
SJMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2434
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2416
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLCO's Valuation (82) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (99) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

MLCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (100) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.

MLCO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (39) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (24) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLCOSJMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGBHX40.480.05
+0.12%
American Funds Global Balanced R5E
DLDCX37.83N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Natural Resources C
MXPBX12.76N/A
N/A
Empower International Index Instl
DHIVX13.48N/A
N/A
Centre Global Infrastructure Advisor
KINAX97.58N/A
N/A
Kinetics Internet Adv A

MLCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLCO has been closely correlated with LVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLCO jumps, then LVS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLCO
1D Price
Change %
MLCO100%
+1.75%
LVS - MLCO
71%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
WYNN - MLCO
66%
Closely correlated
+3.46%
SCHYY - MLCO
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
GXYYY - MLCO
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.55%
WYNMY - MLCO
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.71%
More

SJMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHF has been loosely correlated with SJMHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHF jumps, then SJMHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJMHF
1D Price
Change %
SJMHF100%
N/A
SJMHY - SJMHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GXYYY - SJMHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
SCHYF - SJMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLCO - SJMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
WYNN - SJMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.46%
More