Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLGRX vs RGAFX
MLGRX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MLGRX vs RGAFX
MLGRX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLGRX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLGRX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLGRX (12.7B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MLGRX: RGAFX (0.46) vs MLGRX (0.00). MLGRX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MLGRX (20 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). MLGRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). MLGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). MLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: MLGRX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. MLGRX (-13.05). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.20 vs. MLGRX (-41.65).
| MLGRX | RGAFX | MLGRX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.34 | 379% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.34 | 382% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.060 | 6.478 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 361B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.05 | 8.96 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.11 | 46.79 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.65 | 17.20 | -242% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.95 | 116.72 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement