Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLINX vs RGACX
MLINX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MLINX vs RGACX
MLINX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLINX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLINX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MLINX (12.6B). MLINX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLINX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MLINX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MLINX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: RGACX (250) vs MLINX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. MLINX (-14.75). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. MLINX (-37.57).
| MLINX | RGACX | MLINX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.93 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.93 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.053 | 6.959 | 44% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 357B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.75 | 3.68 | -401% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.31 | 37.13 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.57 | 13.46 | -279% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.06 | 97.58 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement