Ad is loading...
MLM
Price
$583.03
Change
-$4.93 (-0.84%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
93 days until earnings call
TGLS
Price
$73.17
Change
-$0.77 (-1.04%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
102 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MLM vs TGLS

Header iconMLM vs TGLS Comparison
Open Charts MLM vs TGLSBanner chart's image
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$583.03
Change-$4.93 (-0.84%)
Volume$400.42K
CapitalizationN/A
Tecnoglass
Price$73.17
Change-$0.77 (-1.04%)
Volume$258.58K
CapitalizationN/A
MLM vs TGLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLM vs. TGLS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a Sell and TGLS is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MLM: $583.03 vs. TGLS: $73.17)
Brand notoriety: MLM and TGLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLM: 89% vs. TGLS: 82%
Market capitalization -- MLM: $37.96B vs. TGLS: $2.45B
MLM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $37.96B. TGLS’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MLM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TGLS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGLS is a better buy in the long-term than MLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TGLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the short-term than TGLS.

Price Growth

MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а -5.90% price change this week, while TGLS (@Construction Materials) price change was -3.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLM is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

TGLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.99% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($38B) has a higher market cap than TGLS($2.45B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than TGLS: MLM (31.28) vs TGLS (13.39). TGLS YTD gains are higher at: 61.017 vs. MLM (17.336). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.17B vs. TGLS (292M). MLM has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. TGLS (132M). TGLS has less debt than MLM: TGLS (170M) vs MLM (4.73B). MLM has higher revenues than TGLS: MLM (6.78B) vs TGLS (833M).
MLMTGLSMLM / TGLS
Capitalization38B2.45B1,554%
EBITDA2.17B292M743%
Gain YTD17.33661.01728%
P/E Ratio31.2813.39234%
Revenue6.78B833M814%
Total Cash1.27B132M964%
Total Debt4.73B170M2,779%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLM vs TGLS: Fundamental Ratings
MLM
TGLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8777
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
108
SMR RATING
1..100
4135
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
886
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGLS's Valuation (18) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (87) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MLM (10) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's SMR Rating (35) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MLM (41) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (39) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (88) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLMTGLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOWNX16.960.14
+0.83%
Moerus Worldwide Value N
VSIAX88.94-0.60
-0.67%
Vanguard Small Cap Value Index Admiral
PJSQX25.22-0.26
-1.02%
PGIM Jennison Small Company R6
BIAFX43.07-0.50
-1.15%
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Inv
BRSHX15.38-0.26
-1.66%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq C

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
-0.84%
VMC - MLM
89%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
EXP - MLM
75%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
SUM - MLM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
KNF - MLM
67%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
CRH - MLM
66%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
More

TGLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGLS has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGLS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGLS
1D Price
Change %
TGLS100%
-1.04%
BCC - TGLS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
EXP - TGLS
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
SUM - TGLS
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
CRH - TGLS
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
MLM - TGLS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
More