MLM
Price
$625.40
Change
+$1.26 (+0.20%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
37.72B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TGLS
Price
$62.60
Change
+$0.47 (+0.76%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.94B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLM vs TGLS

Header iconMLM vs TGLS Comparison
Open Charts MLM vs TGLSBanner chart's image
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$625.40
Change+$1.26 (+0.20%)
Volume$321.51K
Capitalization37.72B
Tecnoglass
Price$62.60
Change+$0.47 (+0.76%)
Volume$230.88K
Capitalization2.94B
MLM vs TGLS Comparison Chart in %
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLM vs. TGLS commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a Hold and TGLS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MLM: $625.40 vs. TGLS: $62.60)
Brand notoriety: MLM and TGLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLM: 90% vs. TGLS: 64%
Market capitalization -- MLM: $37.72B vs. TGLS: $2.94B
MLM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $37.72B. TGLS’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $78.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TGLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the long-term than TGLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TGLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGLS is a better buy in the short-term than MLM.

Price Growth

MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while TGLS (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

TGLS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.11% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($37.7B) has a higher market cap than TGLS($2.94B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than TGLS: MLM (34.63) vs TGLS (16.09). MLM YTD gains are higher at: 21.622 vs. TGLS (-20.584). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.19B vs. TGLS (295M). MLM has more cash in the bank: 225M vs. TGLS (41.7M). TGLS has less debt than MLM: TGLS (109M) vs MLM (5.81B). MLM has higher revenues than TGLS: MLM (6.69B) vs TGLS (956M).
MLMTGLSMLM / TGLS
Capitalization37.7B2.94B1,282%
EBITDA2.19B295M744%
Gain YTD21.622-20.584-105%
P/E Ratio34.6316.09215%
Revenue6.69B956M699%
Total Cash225M41.7M540%
Total Debt5.81B109M5,329%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLM vs TGLS: Fundamental Ratings
MLM
TGLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
951
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1519
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2482
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
882
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGLS's Valuation (17) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (89) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (19) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's SMR Rating (100) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (100) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGLS (82) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for TGLS (82) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew significantly faster than TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLMTGLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWDAX19.58N/A
N/A
Templeton World Adv
NMFIX14.00N/A
N/A
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
GQGRX17.65N/A
N/A
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity R6
SQBFX14.89N/A
N/A
X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC A
HGXTX17.12N/A
N/A
Hartford Global Impact R5

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
+0.20%
VMC - MLM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
EXP - MLM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
KNF - MLM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
CRH - MLM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
BCC - MLM
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More

TGLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGLS has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGLS jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGLS
1D Price
Change %
TGLS100%
+0.76%
CRH - TGLS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
EXP - TGLS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
BCC - TGLS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
KNF - TGLS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
MLM - TGLS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
More