MLM
Price
$622.08
Change
-$9.95 (-1.57%)
Updated
Oct 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
37.54B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TGLS
Price
$59.66
Change
-$1.10 (-1.81%)
Updated
Oct 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.8B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLM vs TGLS

Header iconMLM vs TGLS Comparison
Open Charts MLM vs TGLSBanner chart's image
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$622.08
Change-$9.95 (-1.57%)
Volume$1.72K
Capitalization37.54B
Tecnoglass
Price$59.66
Change-$1.10 (-1.81%)
Volume$4.83K
Capitalization2.8B
MLM vs TGLS Comparison Chart in %
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLM vs. TGLS commentary
Oct 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a StrongBuy and TGLS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MLM: $622.50 vs. TGLS: $59.69)
Brand notoriety: MLM and TGLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLM: 63% vs. TGLS: 143%
Market capitalization -- MLM: $37.54B vs. TGLS: $2.8B
MLM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $37.54B. TGLS’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $78.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TGLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the long-term than TGLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGLS is a better buy in the short-term than MLM.

Price Growth

MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while TGLS (@Construction Materials) price change was -5.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

TGLS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.98% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($37.5B) has a higher market cap than TGLS($2.81B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than TGLS: MLM (34.47) vs TGLS (15.34). MLM YTD gains are higher at: 21.058 vs. TGLS (-24.275). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.19B vs. TGLS (295M). MLM has more cash in the bank: 225M vs. TGLS (41.7M). TGLS has less debt than MLM: TGLS (109M) vs MLM (5.81B). MLM has higher revenues than TGLS: MLM (6.69B) vs TGLS (956M).
MLMTGLSMLM / TGLS
Capitalization37.5B2.81B1,337%
EBITDA2.19B295M744%
Gain YTD21.058-24.275-87%
P/E Ratio34.4715.34225%
Revenue6.69B956M699%
Total Cash225M41.7M540%
Total Debt5.81B109M5,329%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLM vs TGLS: Fundamental Ratings
MLM
TGLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1753
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1623
SMR RATING
1..100
6234
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3287
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
884
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGLS's Valuation (17) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (89) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TGLS (23) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TGLS's SMR Rating (34) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MLM (62) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGLS (87) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for TGLS (84) in the Building Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew significantly faster than TGLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLMTGLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMCFX32.26N/A
N/A
GMO International Equity IV
CSGYX35.57N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Growth Inst3
CSAZX15.64N/A
N/A
Columbia Global Opportunities Inst
FBPGX27.57N/A
N/A
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Dividend Plus A
SNXFX14.53N/A
N/A
Schwab 1000 Index®

TGLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGLS has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGLS jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGLS
1D Price
Change %
TGLS100%
-1.76%
CRH - TGLS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
EXP - TGLS
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
BCC - TGLS
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
KNF - TGLS
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
MLM - TGLS
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More