Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLMAX vs NPFFX
MLMAX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MLMAX vs NPFFX
MLMAX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLMAX vs. NPFFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLMAX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLMAX (66M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MLMAX: NPFFX (0.92) vs MLMAX (0.00). MLMAX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MLMAX (10 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). MLMAX (1.85) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). MLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NPFFX (23.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMAX: NPFFX (250) vs MLMAX (1000). MLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.46 vs. NPFFX (7.39). MLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.57 vs. NPFFX (13.14).
| MLMAX | NPFFX | MLMAX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.77 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.77 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.127 | 5.301 | 116% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.46 | 7.39 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.89 | 34.25 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.57 | 13.14 | 316% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.85 | 108.19 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers