Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLMAX vs RNPGX
MLMAX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts MLMAX vs RNPGX
MLMAX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLMAX vs. RNPGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLMAX is a Buy and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MLMAX (64.7M). RNPGX pays higher dividends than MLMAX: RNPGX (1.23) vs MLMAX (0.00). MLMAX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: MLMAX (10 years) vs RNPGX (17 years). MLMAX (1.85) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.40). MLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RNPGX (23.00). RNPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMAX: RNPGX (250) vs MLMAX (1000). MLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.95 vs. RNPGX (14.36). MLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.14 vs. RNPGX (21.23).
| MLMAX | RNPGX | MLMAX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.40 | 338% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.40 | 463% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.616 | 7.401 | 62% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 64.7M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.95 | 14.36 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.56 | 45.94 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.14 | 21.23 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.16 | 119.10 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers