Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLMCX vs NPFFX
MLMCX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MLMCX vs NPFFX
MLMCX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLMCX vs. NPFFX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLMCX is a Buy and NPFFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. MLMCX (66.4M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: NPFFX (0.92) vs MLMCX (0.00). MLMCX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MLMCX (10 years) vs NPFFX (26 years). MLMCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NPFFX (23.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMCX: NPFFX (250) vs MLMCX (1000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.16 vs. NPFFX (3.93). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.38 vs. NPFFX (10.57).
| MLMCX | NPFFX | MLMCX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.77 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 0.77 | 345% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.881 | 6.544 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.4M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 3.93 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.97 | 39.74 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.38 | 10.57 | 363% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.31 | 110.13 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers