Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLMCX vs NPFFX
MLMCX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts MLMCX vs NPFFX
MLMCX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLMCX vs. NPFFX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLMCX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLMCX (65M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: NPFFX (0.92) vs MLMCX (0.00). MLMCX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: MLMCX (10 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). MLMCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NPFFX (23.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMCX: NPFFX (250) vs MLMCX (1000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. NPFFX (3.25). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.31 vs. NPFFX (9.71).
| MLMCX | NPFFX | MLMCX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.77 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 0.77 | 345% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.339 | 3.058 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 3.25 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.81 | 31.46 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.31 | 9.71 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.34 | 102.42 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement