MLPR
Price
$68.23
Change
+$1.82 (+2.74%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Net Assets
57.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UDOW
Price
$70.09
Change
+$0.52 (+0.75%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Net Assets
867.22M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLPR vs UDOW

MLPR vs UDOW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) vs. ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW)

Key Takeaways

  • MLPR is a 1.5x leveraged exchange-traded note (ETN) providing exposure to midstream energy master limited partnerships (MLPs) via the Alerian MLP Index, while UDOW delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the 30 large-cap stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
  • MLPR focuses on the energy infrastructure sector with variable quarterly distributions tied to MLP cash flows, whereas UDOW offers broad equity exposure across 30 blue-chip industrial, financial, and consumer names without sector concentration.
  • Both products use leveraged structures that amplify daily returns and increase volatility and decay risk over longer holding periods compared to unleveraged benchmarks.
  • MLPR carries financing costs and ETN-specific credit risk from the issuer, while UDOW uses a swap-based structure with an expense ratio that reflects its daily reset mechanism.
  • MLPR suits investors seeking amplified midstream energy exposure and income potential, whereas UDOW targets short-term tactical bets on overall U.S. large-cap equity momentum.
  • Cost structures differ due to leverage multipliers and underlying asset classes, with MLPR’s quarterly coupon feature distinguishing it from UDOW’s lack of regular distributions.

Introduction

MLPR and UDOW represent distinct leveraged strategies that appeal to investors pursuing amplified exposure within energy infrastructure and broad U.S. equities, respectively. They do not compete directly for the same benchmark but offer alternative ways to gain magnified sector or market participation. In the current environment of evolving interest rate expectations and sector rotation, these products illustrate how leverage can be applied across different asset classes, helping investors understand trade-offs in volatility, cost, and thematic alignment.

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) Overview

MLPR is an exchange-traded note (ETN) issued by UBS that seeks to deliver 1.5 times the compounded quarterly performance of the Alerian MLP Index, less financing costs and fees. The underlying index comprises midstream energy master limited partnerships (MLPs) involved in transportation, storage, and processing of energy commodities. The ETN typically holds no direct equities and instead provides synthetic exposure through a note structure. It features a variable quarterly coupon linked to leveraged distributions from index constituents. The product resets leverage quarterly and carries ETN credit risk tied to the issuer. Expense characteristics include embedded financing costs that vary with interest rates. Top index components generally include established MLPs such as Enterprise Products Partners and Energy Transfer, resulting in concentrated energy infrastructure exposure.

ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) Overview

UDOW is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) from ProShares that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The benchmark consists of 30 large-capitalization U.S. companies selected for their reputation, growth, and liquidity across sectors including industrials, technology, financials, and consumer staples. UDOW employs swap agreements and other derivatives to achieve the 3x daily target with a daily reset. It maintains a portfolio of holdings that mirrors the index constituents on a leveraged basis. The expense ratio reflects costs associated with leverage and daily rebalancing. This structure provides broad large-cap equity exposure without sector-specific concentration beyond the Dow’s composition.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The broader environment features shifting macroeconomic drivers, including interest rate policy, energy demand trends, and corporate earnings cycles. Midstream energy MLPs benefit from stable fee-based revenues and volume growth in pipelines and storage, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average reflects overall equity market sentiment influenced by economic data and corporate performance. Capital flows into energy infrastructure and large-cap equities respond to commodity price stability and growth expectations. Regulatory developments around energy policy and infrastructure spending can affect MLP distributions, while equity leverage products like UDOW remain sensitive to market volatility and sector rotation between value and growth styles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, MLPR’s performance has been influenced by energy volume trends and distribution stability within the midstream sector, with leverage amplifying both gains and losses relative to unleveraged MLP benchmarks. UDOW has tracked magnified movements in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, showing greater sensitivity to broad equity rallies or pullbacks driven by macroeconomic shifts and earnings seasons. The higher leverage multiplier in UDOW typically results in elevated volatility compared with MLPR’s 1.5x factor. Relative positioning favors MLPR for investors seeking energy infrastructure income amplification, while UDOW provides tactical equity market leverage across a diversified large-cap basket.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, cost efficiency considerations, diversification profile, and current sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to UDOW for investors seeking broad large-cap equity leverage, owing to its established liquidity and alignment with overall market trends. MLPR remains relevant for targeted energy infrastructure exposure but carries additional ETN-specific considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MLPR vs. UDOW commentary
Jul 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPR is a Hold and UDOW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UDOW has more net assets: 867M vs. MLPR (57.3M). MLPR has a higher annual dividend yield than UDOW: MLPR (23.491) vs UDOW (21.757). MLPR was incepted earlier than UDOW: MLPR (6 years) vs UDOW (16 years).
MLPRUDOWMLPR / UDOW
Gain YTD23.49121.757108%
Net Assets57.3M867M7%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.95-
TurnoverN/A24.00-
Yield9.001.19757%
Fund Existence6 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLPRUDOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UDOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JANIX31.040.29
+0.94%
Janus Henderson Triton D
FIVCX41.89N/A
N/A
Nomura Opportunity C
JGISX98.66N/A
N/A
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity R6
TRGAX26.92N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Industrials I
RPNLX15.48N/A
N/A
RiverPark/Next Century Lg Gr Inst

UDOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UDOW and AXP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UDOW and AXP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UDOW
1D Price
Change %
UDOW100%
+0.75%
AXP - UDOW
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
GS - UDOW
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
JPM - UDOW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
MMM - UDOW
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
KD - UDOW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
More