Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLRMX vs RGACX
MLRMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MLRMX vs RGACX
MLRMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLRMX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLRMX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLRMX (12.8B). MLRMX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLRMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MLRMX (6 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MLRMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). MLRMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLRMX: RGACX (250) vs MLRMX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.41 vs. MLRMX (-9.43). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 16.59 vs. MLRMX (-34.60).
| MLRMX | RGACX | MLRMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.93 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.93 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.100 | 8.547 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 361B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.43 | 11.41 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.05 | 46.24 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.60 | 16.59 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement