Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLRSX vs RGACX
MLRSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MLRSX vs RGACX
MLRSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLRSX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLRSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MLRSX (12.4B). MLRSX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLRSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MLRSX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than MLRSX (0.64). MLRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). MLRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MLRSX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. MLRSX (-8.20). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.14 vs. MLRSX (-20.76).
| MLRSX | RGACX | MLRSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.93 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.93 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.855 | 7.360 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 361B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.20 | 3.83 | -214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.05 | 41.76 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.76 | 13.14 | -158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.41 | 100.61 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers