Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLRSX vs RGACX
MLRSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MLRSX vs RGACX
MLRSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLRSX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLRSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MLRSX (11.5B). MLRSX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLRSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MLRSX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than MLRSX (0.64). MLRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). MLRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MLRSX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. MLRSX (-11.88). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. MLRSX (-25.98).
| MLRSX | RGACX | MLRSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.93 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.93 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.981 | 8.819 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.88 | -0.53 | 2,237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.49 | 40.68 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.98 | 10.82 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.88 | 101.31 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement