Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLRSX vs RGACX
MLRSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MLRSX vs RGACX
MLRSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLRSX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLRSX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MLRSX (11.8B). MLRSX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLRSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MLRSX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than MLRSX (0.64). MLRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). MLRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MLRSX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. MLRSX (-12.40). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. MLRSX (-24.99).
| MLRSX | RGACX | MLRSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.93 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.93 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.107 | 5.397 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 357B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.40 | 0.93 | -1,337% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.01 | 33.65 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.99 | 10.91 | -229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.86 | 94.42 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement