Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLXCX vs OSPAX
MLXCX vs OSPAX Comparison
Open Charts MLXCX vs OSPAX
MLXCX vs OSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLXCX vs. OSPAX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLXCX is a Buy and OSPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. MLXCX (416M). OSPAX pays higher dividends than MLXCX: OSPAX (4.64) vs MLXCX (3.73). MLXCX was incepted earlier than OSPAX: MLXCX (12 years) vs OSPAX (13 years). MLXCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than OSPAX (1.20). OSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MLXCX (16.00). MLXCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OSPAX: MLXCX (2500) vs OSPAX (1000000). OSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.22 vs. MLXCX (18.14). OSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 194.87 vs. MLXCX (152.02).
| MLXCX | OSPAX | MLXCX / OSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.20 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.45 | 1.20 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.460 | 23.810 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 416M | 1.22B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 4.64 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.14 | 26.22 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.75 | 95.46 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 152.02 | 194.87 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.82 | 134.62 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement