MLYBY
Price
$4.42
Change
-$0.01 (-0.23%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
28.09B
MLYNF
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.16 (-6.58%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
28.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLYBY vs MLYNF

Header iconMLYBY vs MLYNF Comparison
Open Charts MLYBY vs MLYNFBanner chart's image
Malayan Banking Berhad
Price$4.42
Change-$0.01 (-0.23%)
Volume$6.31K
Capitalization28.09B
Malayan Banking Berhad
Price$2.27
Change-$0.16 (-6.58%)
Volume$2.81K
Capitalization28.09B
MLYBY vs MLYNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLYBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLYNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLYBY vs. MLYNF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To understand the difference between Malayan Banking Bhd - ADR (MLYBY) vs. Malayan Banking Bhd (MLYNF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MLYBY: $4.42 vs. MLYNF: $2.27)
Brand notoriety: MLYBY and MLYNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLYBY: 232% vs. MLYNF: 128%
Market capitalization -- MLYBY: $28.09B vs. MLYNF: $28.09B
MLYBY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $28.09B. MLYNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $28.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLYBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLYNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLYBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLYNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLYNF is a better buy in the long-term than MLYBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLYBY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLYNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLYBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MLYNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLYNF is a better buy in the short-term than MLYBY.

Price Growth

MLYBY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.95% price change this week, while MLYNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.00% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLYBY($28.1B) and MLYNF($28.1B) have the same market capitalization . MLYNF (11.23) and MLYBY (10.92) have similar P/E ratio . MLYNF YTD gains are higher at: 14.341 vs. MLYBY (-3.553). MLYBY (47.4B) and MLYNF (47.4B) have identical debt. MLYBY (28.2B) and MLYNF (28.2B) have equivalent revenues.
MLYBYMLYNFMLYBY / MLYNF
Capitalization28.1B28.1B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.55314.341-25%
P/E Ratio10.9211.2397%
Revenue28.2B28.2B100%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.4B47.4B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLYBY vs MLYNF: Fundamental Ratings
MLYBY
MLYNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5899
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8352
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7471
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLYBY's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MLYNF (47). This means that MLYBY’s stock grew similarly to MLYNF’s over the last 12 months.

MLYNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MLYBY (83). This means that MLYNF’s stock grew similarly to MLYBY’s over the last 12 months.

MLYNF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as MLYBY (5). This means that MLYNF’s stock grew similarly to MLYBY’s over the last 12 months.

MLYNF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MLYBY (61). This means that MLYNF’s stock grew similarly to MLYBY’s over the last 12 months.

MLYNF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as MLYBY (74). This means that MLYNF’s stock grew similarly to MLYBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLYBYMLYNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLYBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLYNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRM.X0.0125480.000292
+2.38%
Serum cryptocurrency
FUN.X0.0094640.000002
+0.03%
FUNToken cryptocurrency
MOB.X0.188912-0.001380
-0.73%
MobileCoin cryptocurrency
KAVA.X0.367496-0.003658
-0.99%
Kava cryptocurrency
XRP.X2.966618-0.045600
-1.51%
XRP cryptocurrency

MLYBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLYBY and MNMB have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLYBY and MNMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLYBY
1D Price
Change %
MLYBY100%
-0.23%
MNMB - MLYBY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGF - MLYBY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLYNF - MLYBY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFBP - MLYBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPCB - MLYBY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLYNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLYNF has been loosely correlated with BKAHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLYNF jumps, then BKAHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLYNF
1D Price
Change %
MLYNF100%
N/A
BKAHF - MLYNF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CITZ - MLYNF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RBNK - MLYNF
37%
Loosely correlated
-10.05%
THVB - MLYNF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCOB - MLYNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More