Advertisement
MMC vs SLQT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMC is a StrongBuy and SLQT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MMC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLQT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SLQT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MMC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLQT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SLQT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MMC (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -2.21% price change this week, while SLQT (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -12.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -4.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -29.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
MMC is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
SLQT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Insurance Brokers/Services (-4.86% weekly)Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
| MMC | SLQT | MMC / SLQT | |
| Capitalization | 101B | 391M | 25,831% |
| EBITDA | 7.23B | 127M | 5,692% |
| Gain YTD | -1.699 | -39.247 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.78 | 226.00 | 11% |
| Revenue | 25.8B | 1.49B | 1,733% |
| Total Cash | 1.68B | 80.1M | 2,094% |
| Total Debt | 21.6B | 423M | 5,106% |
MMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 4 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MMC | SLQT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 52% | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NANR | 61.61 | 0.30 | +0.49% |
| SPDR S&P® North American Natural Res ETF | |||
| EMCS | 31.73 | 0.10 | +0.33% |
| Xtrackers MSCI EMs Climate Selection ETF | |||
| FIDI | 24.36 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| Fidelity International High Div ETF | |||
| FLOT | 51.04 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | |||
| IEDI | 57.03 | -0.03 | -0.05% |
| iShares U.S. Consumer Focused ETF | |||
MMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMC has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMC jumps, then AON could also see price increases.
SLQT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLQT and CRVL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLQT and CRVL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLQT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLQT | 100% | -6.22% | ||
| CRVL - SLQT | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
| EHTH - SLQT | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BRO - SLQT | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| GOCO - SLQT | 25% Poorly correlated | -4.06% | ||
| MMC - SLQT | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||