Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMGAX vs MSNCX
MMGAX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts MMGAX vs MSNCX
MMGAX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMGAX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMGAX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 557M vs. MMGAX (135M). MSNCX (3.41) and MMGAX (3.30) have matching dividends . MMGAX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: MMGAX (38 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MMGAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). MMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MMGAX (4%) and MSNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MMGAX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. MSNCX (4.10). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. MMGAX (-0.13).
| MMGAX | MSNCX | MMGAX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.84 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.86 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.645 | -0.492 | 131% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 557M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.30 | 3.41 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.58 | 4.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.91 | 10.16 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.13 | 0.15 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.77 | 11.59 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers