Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMHAX vs NHCCX
MMHAX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts MMHAX vs NHCCX
MMHAX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHAX vs. NHCCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHAX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. MMHAX (9.65B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than MMHAX: NHCCX (4.63) vs MMHAX (3.99). MMHAX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: MMHAX (16 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than MMHAX (0.88). MMHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NHCCX (18.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMHAX: NHCCX (200) vs MMHAX (15000). MMHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. NHCCX (8.51). MMHAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.30 vs. NHCCX (-2.42).
| MMHAX | NHCCX | MMHAX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.80 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.80 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.884 | 2.752 | 105% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 200 | 7,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.65B | 12.7B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.99 | 4.63 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 8.51 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.07 | 9.47 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.30 | -2.42 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.72 | 17.08 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers