Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMHAX vs NHCCX
MMHAX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts MMHAX vs NHCCX
MMHAX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHAX vs. NHCCX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHAX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MMHAX (9.64B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than MMHAX: NHCCX (4.72) vs MMHAX (4.05). MMHAX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: MMHAX (16 years) vs NHCCX (13 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than MMHAX (0.88). MMHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NHCCX (15.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMHAX: NHCCX (200) vs MMHAX (15000). MMHAX (8.03) and NHCCX (7.86) have marching annual gain over last year. MMHAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.59 vs. NHCCX (-5.24).
| MMHAX | NHCCX | MMHAX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.80 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.80 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.561 | 1.178 | 132% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 200 | 7,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.64B | 12.4B | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 4.72 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.03 | 7.86 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.23 | 11.79 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.59 | -5.24 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.24 | 13.30 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers