Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMHAX vs NHMAX
MMHAX vs NHMAX Comparison
Open Charts MMHAX vs NHMAX
MMHAX vs NHMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHAX vs. NHMAX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHAX is a Hold and NHMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. MMHAX (9.38B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than MMHAX: NHMAX (5.57) vs MMHAX (4.08). MMHAX was incepted earlier than NHMAX: MMHAX (16 years) vs NHMAX (27 years). NHMAX (1.90) is less costly to investors than MMHAX (0.88). MMHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NHMAX (15.00). NHMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MMHAX (3%) vs MMHAX (3%). NHMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMHAX: NHMAX (2500) vs MMHAX (15000). MMHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.34 vs. NHMAX (0.67). MMHAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.44 vs. NHMAX (-4.06).
| MMHAX | NHMAX | MMHAX / NHMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.90 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.90 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.632 | -1.071 | 59% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 71% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.38B | 11.9B | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.08 | 5.57 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.34 | 0.67 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.72 | 11.25 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.44 | -4.06 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.46 | 18.93 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers