Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMHAX vs NHMAX
MMHAX vs NHMAX Comparison
Open Charts MMHAX vs NHMAX
MMHAX vs NHMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHAX vs. NHMAX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHAX is a Hold and NHMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. MMHAX (9.63B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than MMHAX: NHMAX (5.52) vs MMHAX (4.05). MMHAX was incepted earlier than NHMAX: MMHAX (16 years) vs NHMAX (27 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than MMHAX (0.88). MMHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NHMAX (15.00). NHMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MMHAX (3%) vs MMHAX (3%). NHMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMHAX: NHMAX (2500) vs MMHAX (15000). NHMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. MMHAX (8.40). MMHAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.42 vs. NHMAX (-1.46).
| MMHAX | NHMAX | MMHAX / NHMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.00 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.00 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.910 | 2.011 | 95% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 71% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.63B | 12.5B | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 5.52 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.40 | 9.19 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.81 | 11.76 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.42 | -1.46 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.18 | 22.36 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers