Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMHAX vs NHMAX
MMHAX vs NHMAX Comparison
Open Charts MMHAX vs NHMAX
MMHAX vs NHMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHAX vs. NHMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHAX is a Hold and NHMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. MMHAX (9.65B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than MMHAX: NHMAX (5.42) vs MMHAX (3.99). MMHAX was incepted earlier than NHMAX: MMHAX (16 years) vs NHMAX (27 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than MMHAX (0.88). MMHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NHMAX (18.00). NHMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MMHAX (3%) vs MMHAX (3%). NHMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMHAX: NHMAX (2500) vs MMHAX (15000). NHMAX (9.31) and MMHAX (9.23) have marching annual gain over last year. MMHAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.30 vs. NHMAX (1.60).
| MMHAX | NHMAX | MMHAX / NHMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.00 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 2.00 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.884 | 3.092 | 93% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 71% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.65B | 12.7B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.99 | 5.42 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 9.31 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.07 | 12.15 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.30 | 1.60 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.72 | 25.26 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement