Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMHDX vs NHMAX
MMHDX vs NHMAX Comparison
Open Charts MMHDX vs NHMAX
MMHDX vs NHMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHDX vs. NHMAX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHDX is a Hold and NHMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. MMHDX (9.69B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than MMHDX: NHMAX (5.42) vs MMHDX (3.25). MMHDX was incepted earlier than NHMAX: MMHDX (16 years) vs NHMAX (27 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than MMHDX (1.66). MMHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NHMAX (18.00). MMHDX (2500) and NHMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. MMHDX (8.29). MMHDX return over 5 years is better than : 1.29 vs. NHMAX (0.93).
| MMHDX | NHMAX | MMHDX / NHMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.00 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.00 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.908 | 3.307 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.69B | 12.7B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 5.42 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 9.15 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.66 | 11.79 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.29 | 0.93 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.79 | 23.77 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers