Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMHVX vs NHMAX
MMHVX vs NHMAX Comparison
Open Charts MMHVX vs NHMAX
MMHVX vs NHMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHVX vs. NHMAX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHVX is a Hold and NHMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MMHVX (9.64B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than MMHVX: NHMAX (5.52) vs MMHVX (4.04). MMHVX was incepted earlier than NHMAX: MMHVX (16 years) vs NHMAX (27 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than MMHVX (0.91). MMHVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NHMAX (15.00). NHMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MMHVX (3%) vs MMHVX (3%). MMHVX (2500) and NHMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. MMHVX (8.02). MMHVX return over 5 years is better than : 2.49 vs. NHMAX (-1.39).
| MMHVX | NHMAX | MMHVX / NHMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.00 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.00 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.462 | 1.650 | 89% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.64B | 12.4B | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.04 | 5.52 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.02 | 8.72 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.07 | 14.45 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.49 | -1.39 | -180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.61 | 21.38 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers