Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMHVX vs NHMAX
MMHVX vs NHMAX Comparison
Open Charts MMHVX vs NHMAX
MMHVX vs NHMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHVX vs. NHMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHVX is a Hold and NHMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. MMHVX (9.65B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than MMHVX: NHMAX (5.42) vs MMHVX (3.98). MMHVX was incepted earlier than NHMAX: MMHVX (16 years) vs NHMAX (27 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than MMHVX (0.91). MMHVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NHMAX (18.00). NHMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MMHVX (3%) vs MMHVX (3%). MMHVX (2500) and NHMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX (9.31) and MMHVX (9.31) have marching annual gain over last year. MMHVX return over 5 years is better than : 5.30 vs. NHMAX (1.60).
| MMHVX | NHMAX | MMHVX / NHMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.00 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.00 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.877 | 3.092 | 93% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.65B | 12.7B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.98 | 5.42 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 9.31 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.02 | 12.15 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.30 | 1.60 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.19 | 25.26 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement