Advertisement
MMS vs TRI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMS is a Hold and TRI is a Hold.
| MMS | TRI | MMS / TRI | |
| Capitalization | 2.98B | 42.3B | 7% |
| EBITDA | 716M | 3.35B | 21% |
| Gain YTD | -33.002 | -23.458 | 141% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.42 | 25.65 | 33% |
| Revenue | 5.25B | 7.83B | 67% |
| Total Cash | 57M | 567M | 10% |
| Total Debt | 1.73B | 3.18B | 54% |
MMS | TRI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 21 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MMS's Valuation (11) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as TRI (13) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MMS’s stock grew similarly to TRI’s over the last 12 months.
MMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as TRI (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MMS’s stock grew similarly to TRI’s over the last 12 months.
MMS's SMR Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as TRI (59) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MMS’s stock grew similarly to TRI’s over the last 12 months.
TRI's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MMS (61) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew similarly to MMS’s over the last 12 months.
TRI's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MMS (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew similarly to MMS’s over the last 12 months.
| MMS | TRI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 13 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TRI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TRI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MMS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -1.28% price change this week, while TRI (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -7.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
MMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-2.80% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
Advertisement
MMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMS has been loosely correlated with ICFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMS jumps, then ICFI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMS | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| ICFI - MMS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| BRC - MMS | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| BAH - MMS | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| TRI - MMS | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| EXPO - MMS | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||
TRI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRI has been loosely correlated with RELX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRI jumps, then RELX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | 100% | +1.71% | ||
| RELX - TRI | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| EXPO - TRI | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| VRSK - TRI | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| LZ - TRI | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| CPRT - TRI | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||