Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBIX vs RLBCX
MNBIX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBIX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term I
Price$20.67
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets521.77M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.28
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
MNBIX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBIX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBIX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MNBIX (522M). MNBIX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBIX (2.11) vs RLBCX (1.53). MNBIX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBIX (17 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNBIX (0.77). MNBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBIX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBIX (1000000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. MNBIX (2.76). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.14 vs. MNBIX (-1.57).
| MNBIX | RLBCX | MNBIX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.89 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.89 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.540 | 12.747 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 1.53 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.76 | 9.03 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.58 | 41.73 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.57 | 41.14 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.81 | 75.56 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement