Ad is loading...
MNBIX vs RLBCX
MNBIX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBIX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term I
Price$19.67
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets532.13M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.43
Change+$0.18 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.28B
MNBIX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBIX vs. RLBCX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBIX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 237B vs. MNBIX (532M). MNBIX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBIX (2.17) vs RLBCX (1.65). MNBIX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBIX (17 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNBIX (0.82). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBIX (71.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBIX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBIX (1000000). MNBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.71 vs. RLBCX (4.82). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.76 vs. MNBIX (2.68).
| MNBIX | RLBCX | MNBIX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.89 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.89 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.288 | 0.938 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 532M | 237B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 1.65 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 4.82 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.97 | 16.52 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.68 | 32.76 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.23 | 50.74 | -2% |