Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBIX vs RLBCX
MNBIX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBIX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term I
Price$20.81
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets512.61M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.85
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
MNBIX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBIX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBIX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. MNBIX (513M). MNBIX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBIX (2.09) vs RLBCX (1.49). MNBIX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBIX (18 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNBIX (0.77). MNBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBIX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBIX (1000000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. MNBIX (3.67). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.65 vs. MNBIX (-2.82).
| MNBIX | RLBCX | MNBIX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.89 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.89 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.748 | 14.659 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 1.49 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.67 | 9.58 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.69 | 50.48 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.82 | 40.65 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.64 | 74.05 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement