Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBIX vs RLBCX
MNBIX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBIX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term I
Price$20.71
Change+$0.10 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets433.42M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.89
Change+$0.47 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.63B
MNBIX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBIX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBIX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. MNBIX (433M). MNBIX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBIX (2.07) vs RLBCX (1.46). MNBIX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBIX (18 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNBIX (0.77). MNBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBIX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBIX (1000000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. MNBIX (3.63). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.69 vs. MNBIX (-6.63).
| MNBIX | RLBCX | MNBIX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.89 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.89 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.176 | 14.777 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 433M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.46 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | 8.94 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.98 | 39.06 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.63 | 36.69 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.83 | 69.21 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers